tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28543539.post472031196711331278..comments2023-09-20T11:15:28.673+01:00Comments on Transform Drug Policy Foundation Blog: ACMD cannabis classification review submission (round 3)janehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15263261726046054614noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28543539.post-35988655766667011062008-01-29T21:09:00.000+00:002008-01-29T21:09:00.000+00:00anon - theres no dispute that problems with cannab...anon - theres no dispute that problems with cannabis use exist - the question is what is the sensible policy response?Steve Rolleshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11487781869462634203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28543539.post-27911851515845427242008-01-28T11:10:00.000+00:002008-01-28T11:10:00.000+00:00I am a family support worker for a tier two and th...I am a family support worker for a tier two and three service in Sheffield. Many of the families we support have the issue of cannabis and a loved one and in very many cases their is mental health issues such as psycosis, paranoia, OCD to name a few.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28543539.post-84719797830118186442008-01-25T09:52:00.000+00:002008-01-25T09:52:00.000+00:00As someone who has been involved in this charade f...As someone who has been involved in this charade for many years now (as a former police officer responsible for drugs policy in a particular force - and an advisor on the JRF Research carried out by my bestest pal Tiggey)I tire of this whole debate.<BR/><BR/>Whilst I submit that 'ordinary' members of the general public (apparently a vast majority are'users'according to the BCS) would want to know what potential health risks are associated with a drug and the consequences of being caught in possession or trafficking in it,<BR/>I suspect they wouldn't care if it was classified as being a subtle shade of grey with a blue polka dot and sequin finish.<BR/><BR/>It was confusing enough last time - leave it alone for goodness sake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com